Liberty vs License

Here in the wonderful country of the United States we place heavy emphasis on our freedom. We are “the land of the free” and speak it proudly. But what is freedom? Is all freedom a good thing? Is liberty and license the same?

One is the “freedom of/for” and the other is “freedom from”.


License is the form of freedom that most people think about. When they envision freedom they look at it as a state of being free from all restraints. One of the most notable pioneers of this form of freedom was Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau was an enlightenment era thinker of Swiss birth in the 1700s. His most notable work was the Social Contract in which he praised the return of man to the state of nature. He believed that the state and society created a less free man and that he could not be completely free as long as property ownership and laws existed. This led to the, at the time, radical notion that man must return to a state of nature so that he can have the freedom to do as he pleased. Basically a state of anarchy.

License is the “freedom from” something. It is a form of absolute freedom from any form of law, code or restraint. License is a form of false freedom, lacking a guide to morals and order, which in turn leads to anarchic chaos. However, complete license is not something that most people would go for. Majority of people support some form of laws to keep things held together, but what you do get is a moral license which relates heavily to moral relativism (Click Here). Moral License is the view that morally one can do as he/she pleases. People think that this gives them freedom but in reality all it does is make you a slave to your own desires. Take a look at society. Illegitimate births, high std rate, high abortion rate, divorce and family structure breakdown. The breakdown of family structure alone creates a self perpetuating system of broken homes and psychologically damaged kids. Moral License is NOT freedom. It is enslavement to carnal pleasures and habitual desires.


Liberty is the “freedom for”. It means you have the freedom to carry out the virtues and to do the good without restraint. If you take a look at our foundation we see that we are bestowed many liberties. For example we have the Freedom of Speech. This means we are able to speak out on issues and let our voices be heard. This, however, does not mean you have the license to slander other people, print lies, use hate and violence or be destructive to society. Liberties must be taken within context of moral order and the common good.

It is said that the virtuous man is the most free. Why? Look at it like this. If you have a desire to kill someone and the law says you cannot kill me then you are not free to do so. However, if you were a virtuous man you would have no desire to kill me so the law would not be restraining you.

Liberty, when put in a Christian context, is the most free someone can be. License is enslavement to sin.


2 thoughts on “Liberty vs License

  1. “Moral License is NOT freedom. It is enslavement to carnal pleasures and habitual desires.”

    The Commandments call men to freedom from their self destructive tendencies. I would just add that one must be careful in the area of morality. The Church must avoid promulgating rules for the sake of rules. The Church has no license to abuse its authority.

    As to carnal pleasures, can the Catholic Church do justice to the dignity of married persons and let go of its extreme sexual pessimism? Can the Church finally understand and respect that the lovemaking of the spouses is not solely for procreation?

    Most Catholic apologists do not know the history of the Church’s sexual pessimism (which has ancient pagan roots) and defend the Church without ever considering if all that “the Church teaches” is on solid ground.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Not sure I can give you an answer at the moment. I wrote this a long time ago when I was moving into the place I am now. I probably should revisit a few things. I haven’t gone very deep into trying to understand the morality of such things yet since I am single. Iv moved more into political posts from a counter revolutionary stand point. I may revisit moral theology like this but at the moment I don’t have the knowledge to go too deep into it. I think the point of the post was to address that we have the freedom to choose the Good. Not license in all things. Obviously we can willingly choose to do whatever but I am talking from the metaphysical principle of freedom. Not the material freedom form all forms of authority. But I’m not sure I can answer you question without treading into unknown territory. I’ll read into such things and maybe revisit this post. Thanks for the comment!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s